George Loria – Georgian-American University
George Loria is an accomplished international relations and diplomacy professional, currently serving as the Head of International Relations Division at the Administration of the Government of Georgia. Throughout his professional career at the Ministry of Defense and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, he has held key diplomatic roles at the Embassy of Georgia in Azerbaijan and Uzbekistan. Within the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, George held roles like Deputy Head of International Organizations Department, Ambassador at Large on Abkhazia issues, and Head of Minister’s Secretariat. George holds a MSc Degree from Middlesex University, earned through the Chevening Scholarship, and is a faculty member at the Georgian-American University, specializing in international security and Eastern Europe.
Mariam Gamdlishvili – Caucasus University
Mariam Gamdlishvili is an international relations and strategic communications specialist. She currently holds the position of Senior Specialist at the International Relations Department of the Administration of the Government of Georgia. She’s also an Invited Lecturer at Caucasus University and has delivered lectures at the Defence Institution Building School of the Ministry of Defence of Georgia. Mariam, a former Edmund S. Muskie Fellow at the George Washington, brings extensive experience in Georgia’s European and Euro-Atlantic integration, strategic communications, and disinformation. She holds MA in Strategic Communications from King’s College London (UK FCDO Scholarship) and MA in Communications from the University of Southern Indiana (Fulbright Scholarship). She also holds an MA degree in EU Studies (CIFE Erasmus+), and BSc degree in International Relations.
This contribution is part of the book “The Dragon at the Gates of Europe: Chinese presence in the Balkans and Central-Eastern Europe” (more info here) and has been selected for open access publication on Blue Europe website for a wider reach. Citation:
Loria, George, and Mariam Gamdlishvili, China’s Presence and Influence in Eastern Europe – Unveiling the Complexities of China’s Growing Influence in Eastern Europe: A Case Study of Georgia, in: Andrea Bogoni and Brian F. G. Fabrègue, eds., The Dragon at the Gates of Europe: Chinese Presence in the Balkans and Central-Eastern Europe, Blue Europe, Dec 2023: pp. 481-508. ISBN: 979-8989739806.
Disclaimer (by the authors): The viewpoints articulated in this chapter are exclusively those of the authors’ and should not be viewed as an official standpoint of the Georgian Government nor Blue Europe.
1. Introduction
Growing Chinese presence in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union – Background
The growing presence of China in Eastern Europe and the countries of former Soviet Union marks a significant shift in global geopolitics, with far-reaching implications for regional dynamics and global power structures. This phenomenon is rooted in a historical context, reflecting China’s strategic ambitions, economic interests, and diplomatic initiatives.
China’s involvement in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union has evolved over decades, with diplomatic relations established during the Cold War era. However, the current surge in Chinese influence has been driven by the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), a comprehensive infrastructure and connectivity project that aims to revitalize ancient trade routes. As part of the BRI, China seeks to establish a network of railways, highways, ports, and energy projects that connect the Eurasian continent.
China’s engagement with Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) has evolved over time, stemming from a regional diplomacy approach it initiated in the mid-1990s[1]. This approach signifies China’s intent to establish multifaceted connections beyond infrastructure enhancement. Beyond upgrading infrastructure, China’s involvement in the CEE region extends to building intricate relationships that encompass various sectors, such as administration, business, journalism, agriculture, innovation, technology, culture, education, and academia[2]. This also underlines China’s ambition to foster a comprehensive network of interactions within the region.
As China’s global influence has risen rapidly, it has presented new challenges for established powers like the United States, the European Union (EU), and individual European governments[3]. Beijing’s emergence offers an alternative to Western influence, providing predefined solutions for nations seeking economic advancement, however, China also capitalizes on local vulnerabilities, leveraging factors such as weak institutions and limited civil society participation to assert its economic, political, and soft power influence[4]. This dual approach highlights China’s multifaceted engagement and its capacity to navigate complex regional dynamics.
While China’s expanding presence in Southeastern, Central, and Eastern Europe offers potential socioeconomic benefits, it also brings inherent risks. China’s involvement has the potential to exacerbate governance shortcomings, disrupt political and economic stability, and complicate the EU’s efforts to achieve consensus on critical matters[5]. The impact of China’s engagement necessitates careful consideration of its consequences within the regional context.
Understanding China’s policies in the region
The economic component of China’s engagement is evident through substantial investments in critical infrastructure projects. Ports in the Black Sea region, railways that link Eastern Europe to Asia, and energy facilities designed to enhance energy security have received significant attention[6]. These investments are designed to facilitate trade, increase connectivity, and elevate China’s global economic influence. However, this influx of Chinese capital raises questions about the long-term economic sustainability of the region, as well as the potential for debt dependency. Since the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russian invasion of Ukraine roiled global markets, a climbing number of low-income Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) countries have struggled to repay loans associated with the initiative, spurring a wave of debt crises and new criticism for BRI[7].
Beyond economics, China’s presence in Eastern Europe carries profound political implications. Geopolitically, this region occupies a pivotal position, serving as a crossroads between Europe and Asia and holding a strategic role in global trade and energy routes. China’s interest in the Black Sea region is tied to its maritime and energy security needs. Notably, China’s cooperation with Russia complicates regional dynamics, as it raises concerns about potential encroachment on the sovereignty of smaller countries and challenges the unity of international organizations.
China’s soft power means and sharp power projection tactics have become increasingly visible in Eastern Europe. The Chinese government employs cultural exchange programs, educational initiatives, and media outreach to project a positive image[8]. However, this raises concerns about China’s intentions and the risk of undue influence on local policies and public sentiment. The use of soft power for sharp power projection, aimed at subtly promoting China’s interests, is a growing concern[9].
China’s diplomatic priorities in Eastern Europe are also marked by its former “16+1” framework, and currently known as “14+1”, aimed at engaging with Central and Eastern European countries. This initiative seeks to foster cooperation in various sectors, ranging from infrastructure development to cultural exchange. However, diverging priorities among participating nations and the variable benefits they receive from Chinese engagement have led to tensions and imbalances within the framework.
As Eastern Europe grapples with regional conflicts and strives to define its role in global politics, China’s stance on issues such as the Russia-Georgia war and the recognition of territorial integrity holds significance. China’s alignment with Russia’s position, as well as its approach to regional disputes, can impact the stability of the region and the resolution of long-standing conflicts.
China’s relationship with the European Union (EU) is another dimension that shapes its engagement in Eastern Europe. The interaction between China’s bilateral engagements and the EU’s policies regarding the region plays a crucial role in shaping the trajectory of Eastern European countries’ integration with both China and the EU. The EU’s concerns about human rights, transparency, and fair competition have prompted discussions about the balance between economic interests and these values in bilateral relations. For Georgia, a nation that has enshrined the prioritization of EU and NATO integration within its constitutional framework, the task of navigating its relationships with prospective regional competitors becomes notably intricate. Compounded by this, the country’s commitment to strategic partnerships with the United States and Turkey (NATO members) adds another layer of complexity. In a recent development, Georgia has also advanced its existing bilateral cooperation with China, elevating it to the level of a Strategic Partnership[10]. These present dynamics collectively contribute to the reconfiguration of a potentially novel regional status quo.
Furthermore, China’s strategic goals, economic interests, and diplomatic priorities converge in this region, influencing power dynamics, economic development, and regional stability. Therefore, China’s policies in Eastern Europe, particularly in Georgia, are shaped by strategic goals, and diplomatic priorities characterized by using economic interests and soft power means as a tool. Analyzing China’s engagement through this lens enables a deeper understanding of its role and impact on Eastern Europe and its broader implications on global geopolitics.
2. Economic Interests
Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) and its impact on Eastern Europe
The BRI, launched by China in 2013, has become a centerpiece of China’s foreign policy and economic strategy. Designed to foster connectivity and cooperation between Asia, Europe, and beyond, the BRI envisions a vast network of infrastructure projects, including roads, railways, ports, and pipelines, with the goal of enhancing trade, investment, and economic development. As a key component of China’s global outreach, the BRI also holds implications for Eastern Europe, which has increasingly become a target for Chinese investment and engagement.
On one hand, the initiative presents opportunities for the region’s economic growth, modernization, and integration into global supply chains. China’s investments in infrastructure projects, such as ports and railways, offer the potential to improve transportation and logistics networks, reducing trade barriers and promoting trade diversification. These projects can also stimulate local economies and create jobs, thereby contributing to the region’s development.
However, the BRI also poses several challenges and risks for Eastern Europe. One major concern revolves around debt sustainability. Some Eastern European countries have shown enthusiasm for Chinese financing due to their limited access to other sources of investment. However, these loans can result in significant debt burdens, potentially compromising the financial stability of these countries and limiting their policy autonomy. Cases of “debt-trap diplomacy,” where countries become dependent on China due to their inability to repay loans, have raised alarm bells in the region.
Another critical concern is the strategic implications of China’s growing presence. While the BRI’s focus is primarily economic, its expansion into Eastern Europe raises questions about China’s broader geopolitical intentions. Some analysts view China’s investments and infrastructure development as a means to gain political influence and leverage in the region. This is particularly relevant given the European Union’s interests and concerns about maintaining cohesion among its member states.
In conclusion, the BRI has a nuanced impact on Eastern Europe. It brings both opportunities and risks, reflecting the complexity of China’s engagement in the region. As Eastern European countries navigate their participation in the BRI, careful assessment of its economic benefits, debt sustainability, strategic implications, and alignment with the European Union’s objectives will be crucial in shaping the future trajectory of the region’s relationship with China.
Chinese investment in Georgia’s infrastructure, energy, and telecommunications sectors
In addition to its strategic location and transit potential, Georgia has other unique features that make it an attractive destination for foreign investment. The country has a liberal and business-friendly environment and has implemented a series of reforms to improve the ease of doing business. Georgia also has free trade agreements with the European Union, the Commonwealth of Independent States, and China, providing access to a market of more than two billion people.
Georgia’s free trade agreements have played a vital role in its economic development, as they have opened up new markets and increased exports. For instance, the country’s free trade agreement with the European Union, which came into effect in 2014, has led to an increase in Georgian exports to the EU, particularly in the agricultural sector. Additionally, the country’s free trade agreement with China has provided opportunities for Georgia to access the Chinese market and attract Chinese investment.
In 2015, the Prime Minister of Georgia expressed his support for the BRI[11] as a way to enhance economic cooperation and infrastructure development between China and Georgia. Prior to the full-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine, China did not tend to consider Georgia as a strategically important direction. However, lately, the role of the Georgian direction gained new momentum, and China began to operate in a large-scale and autonomous manner.
It is important to recognize that the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is a very complex one, and there are various factors that can hinder its success. While political factors are undoubtedly important, they are not the only considerations to bear in mind. Rather, it is essential to strike a balance between geopolitical considerations and practical business objectives.
BRI has raised concerns from some Western countries who view it as a means for China to expand its global influence. As a result, there have been fears about potential debt traps that recipient countries may fall into. It is crucial to address these concerns and work towards a mutually beneficial relationship between China and other countries. On the other hand, there are spheres that are more business and practical result oriented. While it is important to be aware of the geopolitical considerations, it is also possible to avoid going deep into politically sensitive areas and concentrate on practical, result-oriented spheres. In Georgia, for example, the government has welcomed Chinese investment as a way to promote economic development. By focusing on areas such as agriculture, infrastructure, and venture investments, Chinese companies can demonstrate their value to the Georgian market and avoid politically sensitive issues.
Benefits and risks of China’s economic presence in Georgia
The bilateral trade volume between China and Georgia is illustrative of the mutually beneficial nature of this cooperation. With China ranking among Georgia’s top trading partners, the trade turnover has demonstrated notable fluctuations in recent years. A case in point is the expansion of trade turnover between 2021 and 2022, marked by a 26% increase amounting to $1863 million USD. Moreover, the implementation of the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) between the two countries in 2018 heralded a significant transformation in Georgia’s export composition, propelling exports to surge by 265% from 2017 to 2022.
While the BRI carries substantial benefits, it is not devoid of risks that necessitate judicious evaluation. Fluctuations in trade turnover, such as the 14% decrease in the first half of 2023 compared to the same period in the previous year, exemplify the economic volatility inherent to such engagements. The dependency on China’s economic performance underscores the need for Georgia to insulate itself from potential shocks and diversify its trading partners.
China’s economic engagement with Georgia through the BRI encompasses a blend of opportunities and risks that demand prudent and holistic considerations. The alignment of the two nations’ economic aspirations reflects a convergence of interests that can be harnessed to foster economic growth, modernization, and connectivity. However, the inherent complexities and potential risks underscore the need for Georgia to adopt a balanced approach that safeguards its economic sovereignty, mitigates risks associated with dependency, and positions itself as a harmonizing conduit within the broader regional context. As Georgia navigates its partnership with China, the synthesis of benefits and risks will inevitably shape the course of their bilateral relationship and contribute to the broader discourse surrounding the BRI’s impact on Eastern Europe.
3. Strategic Goals
China’s efforts to increase its global influence and counterbalance the United States and West as a whole.
China’s concerted efforts to expand its global influence and recalibrate the global power balance vis-à-vis the United States and the Western world constitute a complex geopolitical phenomenon with profound implications for international relations. As China’s economic and military prowess burgeons, its strategic maneuvering to counterbalance Western dominance reflects a calculated strategy aimed at redefining the contours of the global order.
Furthermore, China’s ascendancy as a global economic powerhouse has been a linchpin of its efforts to counterbalance Western influence. Central to this strategy is the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), an expansive network of infrastructural projects spanning continents, which underscores China’s determination to reshape global trade and connectivity on its terms. By financing and constructing critical infrastructure across Asia, Africa, and Europe, China not only bolsters its own economic interests but also cultivates political leverage in regions traditionally influenced by the West.
China’s efforts to counterbalance the West extend beyond economics and technology to encompass cultural and ideological dimensions. The propagation of its culture and values, often termed “soft power,” serves as a mechanism to shape global narratives and perceptions. Initiatives such as the Confucius Institutes and the promotion of the Chinese language abroad exemplify China’s cultural diplomacy, aimed at cultivating a positive image and fostering connections with foreign societies.
Consequently, China’s efforts to augment its global influence and counterbalance the United States and the West reflect a strategic recalibration of international dynamics. As China leverages its economic prowess, technological advancements, soft power projection, and diplomatic engagements, in China’s view it seeks to erode Western domination and assert its own vision of a multipolar world order[12]. The implications of China’s endeavors reverberate across diverse domains, from economic and technological innovation to cultural diplomacy and global governance. Consequently, China’s trajectory as a global counterbalancing force remains a pivotal determinant of the evolving geopolitical landscape in the twenty-first century.
Importance of the Black Sea region and Georgia’s strategic location
The Black Sea region holds significant geopolitical and economic importance due to its strategic location as a crossroads between Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. Hence, Georgia’s unique geographic position between the Black Sea and the Caspian Sea renders it a pivotal hub for trade, transportation, and energy transit.
From a Chinese perspective, the Black Sea region holds an immense importance within its global strategy. China’s rising economic prowess and energy needs drive its interest in securing reliable trade routes and sources of energy. The Black Sea’s role as a transit hub for energy pipelines and maritime trade aligns with China’s broader Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) ambitions, which seek to enhance connectivity and infrastructure across Eurasia[13]. Additionally, China’s growing engagement with Central and Eastern European countries through the “14+1” framework further magnifies the Black Sea’s significance, as these countries serve as potential partners in advancing the BRI and expanding China’s economic and political influence. Therefore, China’s strategic lens views the Black Sea region, including Georgia’s pivotal location, as an essential corridor to foster trade, connectivity, and geopolitical leverage in its pursuit of global influence.
China’s cooperation with Russia and its implications and threats for Georgia
For Georgia, the China-Russia partnership introduces a strategic dilemma. While Georgia maintains amicable relations with China and seeks to benefit from its economic opportunities, it also faces the challenge of Russia’s assertive actions in the region. The Russia-Georgia conflict over now occupied by Russia Georgian territories of Abkhazia and Tskhinvali regions has left Georgia’s territorial integrity and sovereignty in question, and Russia’s continued military presence in these regions complicates efforts to resolve these disputes. China’s alignment with Russia on certain international issues could limit its willingness to pressure Moscow on Georgia’s behalf or impede support for Georgia’s territorial sovereignty within international forums.
Furthermore, China’s economic engagement with Russia has the potential to indirectly undermine Georgia’s position. As Russia seeks to mitigate the effects of Western sanctions through closer ties with China, Georgia could find itself in a situation where it is inadvertently affected by broader economic and geopolitical developments between these two powers. For instance, if China deepens its economic integration with Russia, it might indirectly strengthen Moscow’s hand in regional disputes and embolden Russia’s assertiveness in Eastern Europe, including Georgia.
Soft power means and risks for the Chinese sharp power projection in Georgia
China’s pursuit of soft power means as part of its broader strategy in Georgia carries both opportunities and risks, necessitating careful analysis of its implications. Soft power, a concept coined by Joseph Nye, refers to a nation’s ability to attract and influence others through cultural, economic, and political appeal rather than coercive force[14].
However, China’s efforts to project soft power have sometimes been seen as veering into what is referred to as “sharp power,” which involves the use of manipulation and propaganda to shape public opinion and decision-making. Instances of coercive campaigns, economic or debt dependence related attempts to control narratives may negatively impact on the democratic discourse in Georgia. Furthermore, the economic leverage may potentially be used by China at the international level.
Strategic Partnership Launch
Very recently, China and Georgia have taken a step forward by launching Strategic Partnership marking a new phase in their bilateral relations[15]. This collaborative effort shows a commitment, between the two countries to enhance cooperation in areas, including the economy, politics and culture. Through this partnership China and Georgia aim to improve understanding strengthen ties and promote joint initiatives that can bring shared benefits. This strategic partnership emphasizes the importance of engagement on global matters highlighting the increasing significance of both nations, on the international stage. By closer cooperation China and Georgia have the potential not only to boost bilateral trade and investment but also to contribute to regional stability and prosperity.
Furthermore, this formed strategic alliance, between China and Georgia aims to strike a balance between the connections with the European Union and the United States. This collaboration does not jeopardize the existing partnerships with allies. Instead, they envision this partnership as a bridge that connects the East and West opening opportunities that can benefit all involved parties. By leveraging their strengths and resources China and Georgia aspire to contribute to a global landscape where cooperation and interconnectedness flourish thereby, promoting stability and prosperity across multiple regions.
Through the lense of BRI, its potential exacerbate geopolitical tensions cannot be overlooked. Eastern Europe is situated at the crossroads of various regional interests, including those of the European Union, Russia, and now China. As China invests in critical infrastructure, such as ports and energy projects, it may inadvertently become entangled in existing disputes or amplify existing rivalries. This dynamic has the potential to complicate the delicate balance of power in the region. Current elevation of relations at the strategic level creates a nuanced status quo for Georgia. In addition to geopolitical considerations, the BRI also intersects with the European Union’s efforts to enhance its connectivity with neighboring regions. The EU’s Eastern Partnership initiative seeks to deepen cooperation with Eastern European countries, focusing on democratic governance, economic development, and connectivity. While the BRI offers opportunities for connectivity, it could also pose challenges to the EU’s efforts, particularly if there is a lack of coordination and alignment between the two initiatives.
4. Diplomatic Priorities
Global Security Initiative, Global Development Initiative and Engagement with Eastern European countries through the “16+1″(now 14+1) framework
China’s pursuit of the Global Development Initiative and Global Security Initiative underscore its broader aspirations to expand its global influence and counterbalance claimed, “Western dominance”. These initiatives, often seen as elements of China’s soft power projection, aim to shape global narratives, economic structures, and security frameworks in ways that align with China’s interests. Georgia’s support for these initiatives can be interpreted through an analytical lens that considers both the potential benefits and inherent risks associated with China’s growing global influence. The expansion of China’s economic reach also raises concerns about the implications of economic dependence. As Georgia embraces China’s developmental assistance, it must carefully navigate the potential pitfalls of debt-trap diplomacy and assess the long-term sustainability of its economic partnerships.
China’s growing global influence through these initiatives also intersects with its soft power projection and, at times, its use of sharp power tactics. The alignment with China’s initiatives could expose Georgia to narratives and discourses that reflect China’s worldview, potentially diluting its own independent foreign policy perspective. The convergence of soft and sharp power methods raises questions about the extent to which Georgia can retain its sovereignty and safeguard its strategic interests.
Georgia’s diplomatic engagements with China are not limited to bilateral relations, as its interest in the “14+1” framework showcases. The “14+1” cooperation, initially known as “17+1,” encompasses Central and Eastern European Countries (CEECs) collaborating with China. This platform has evolved, reflecting shifts in its composition and scope[16]. Georgia’s pursuit of observership in this platform demonstrates its commitment to regional collaboration. In February 2017, Georgia sought observer status within the “16+1” Secretariat in Beijing. Although all 16 European countries within the framework expressed support, China declined Georgia’s request. The evolving nomenclature, transitioning from “17+1” to “16+1,” underscores the dynamics at play.
Since its inception, the platform has hosted summits across Europe, with nations engaging in discussions on regional development and cooperation. Over time, entities like Greece joined, transforming the format into “17+1,” and later reverting to “16+1.” Currently, five entities, including Austria, Belarus, Switzerland, the European Union, and the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, hold observer status. Nonetheless, recent developments within the framework highlight its complexities. Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia’s departure in 2021 and 2022 indicate varying perspectives on the platform’s efficacy[17]. The Czech Republic’s assessment in 2023 of it being “inactive” underscores the evolving nature of this multilateral engagement.
Approach to regional conflicts and its implications for Georgia’s territorial integrity
Some concerns have been raised regarding how China could potentially exploit Georgia’s unresolved disputes after the Russian-Georgian War. While it is important to consider this perspective, we must also recognize that China’s foreign policy approach is multifaceted. China’s stance on Georgia’s integrity is intertwined to its territorial issues, particularly its position on Taiwan. Just as China strongly asserts its claim over Taiwan as a part of its territory it remains committed to upholding Georgia’s territorial integrity. This interconnectedness highlights the principle of parity, where both China and Georgia endorse and protect each other’s sovereignty.
Despite its close partnership with Russia, it is crucial to acknowledge that China has perspectives on territorial matters. Its approach is shaped by a balance between alliances and a commitment to principles of sovereignty and non-interference. This can be seen in how it handles the Taiwan issue and the historical sensitivities surrounding it. Likewise, when examining China’s engagement, with Georgia, we must understand it within the context of its foreign policy framework that seeks to align diplomatic pursuits with foundational principles.
Relations with the European Union and their impact on Georgia’s EU aspirations
The dynamics between the European Union (EU), Georgia, and China form a complex geopolitical landscape with multiple dimensions of cooperation, competition, and influence. As Georgia aspires to strengthen its ties with the EU while also engaging with China’s growing presence, these relationships intersect and create both opportunities and challenges for the country’s foreign policy goals.
Georgia’s European aspirations are deeply intertwined with its pursuit of closer ties with the EU. The EU integration process offers Georgia the promise of economic integration, political stability, and enhanced rule of law. The Association Agreement and the Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) between Georgia and the EU reflect this commitment, emphasizing economic reforms and legal harmonization.
However, China’s expanding presence in Georgia introduces a new layer of complexity. China’s BRI intersects with Georgia’s aspirations, potentially bringing economic benefits through infrastructure investment and connectivity. Yet, this economic engagement also raises concerns about debt sustainability, transparency, and long-term dependency. The balancing act between deepening ties with the EU and engaging with China requires Georgia to carefully navigate these interests, ensuring that its European integration goals are not compromised.
As the EU seeks to balance its economic interests with its concerns about China’s human rights record and geopolitical ambitions, Georgia’s choices become even more nuanced. The EU’s cautious approach to China’s growing influence in the region may influence Georgia’s decisions, encouraging a more strategic assessment of the risks and benefits of Chinese engagement.
5. Conclusion
To sum up the examination of China’s presence and influence, in Eastern Europe specifically focusing on Georgia reveals a landscape characterized by diplomatic dynamics and global interdependencies. The evolving strategic partnership between China and Georgia highlights the potential for cooperation that goes beyond geographical boundaries. As China expands its footprint in Eastern Europe it becomes crucial to navigate the nuanced complexities that accompany collaborations. While concerns regarding leverage and territorial disputes may arise a deeper understanding emerges; China’s approach relies on maintaining a balance between its principles and partnerships reflecting its commitment to both sovereignty and international cooperation.
The ongoing development of the partnership, between China and Georgia has implications for Georgia’s policy orientation and the overall regional stability. As Georgia strengthens its ties with China it must carefully manage its existing relationships with partners while considering the threat and sensetivities of neighboring Russia. Despite concerns about influences Georgia’s focused efforts to enhance its landscape and improve cross border connectivity align well with the goals of this growing partnership. Finding a balance is crucial as Georgia navigates the task of maintaining its established affiliations while benefiting from the economic opportunities brought by China’s involvement. Given Georgia’s constitutional commitment to its Western EU and NATO aspirations, the task of adroitly balancing its relationships between the West and the East takes on heightened significance. This imperative underscore the need for careful navigation, ensuring that developments should not transpire at the expense of crucial foreign policy priorities and the explicit preferences of the Georgian population.
While the main focus of Georgia-China partnership revolves around growth and diplomatic cooperation it also has implications for stability. The alliance has the potential to contribute constructively to stability through efforts and diplomatic exchanges. However regional dynamics add complexity to this situation. Specifically, Russia’s position in light of its involvement in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict may have an impact, on how this alliance progresses.
In summary the evolving strategic partnership between China and Georgia reveals how interests, geopolitical alignments and regional stability interact. Georgia’s thoughtful approach to managing its relationships and pursuing growth will shape the ongoing story of this alliance. The opportunities, for cooperation and economic progress are contiguous with the complexities of positioning creating a dimensional scenario where global powers and local considerations intersect.
The impact of China’s policies in Eastern Europe could be significant opening opportunities and strengthening regional connections. The Caucasus region, where Georgia plays a role could potentially serve as a foundation for China’s relations with Western countries. However, the success of this foundation will hinge on factors, including how Western nations respond and how the geopolitical landscape evolves. The partnership between China and Georgia presents a nuanced outlook for both Georgia’s policy and regional stability. It also reflects the complexities surrounding China’s policies, in Eastern Europe. It is crucial for all stakeholders involved to balance interests and navigate through dynamics as they shape the future trajectory of these relationships.
References
- Gabriela Pleschová, “China’s engagement in Central and Eastern Europe: regional diplomacy in pursuit of China’s interests,” International Issues & Slovak Foreign Policy Affairs 24, no. 3 (2015): 15-26. ↑
- Gabriela Pleschová, “China’s engagement in Central and Eastern Europe: regional diplomacy in pursuit of China’s interests,” International Issues & Slovak Foreign Policy Affairs 24, no. 3 (2015): 15-26. ↑
- Erik Brattberg, Philippe Le Corre, Paul Stronski, and Thomas de Waal, “China’s Influence in Southeastern, Central, and Eastern Europe: Vulnerabilities and Resilience in Four Countries,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, October 13, 2021,https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/10/13/china-s-influence-in-southeastern-central-and-eastern-europe-vulnerabilities-and-resilience-in-four-countries-pub-85415. ↑
- Erik Brattberg, Philippe Le Corre, Paul Stronski, and Thomas de Waal, “China’s Influence in Southeastern, Central, and Eastern Europe: Vulnerabilities and Resilience in Four Countries,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, October 13, 2021, https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/10/13/china-s-influence-in-southeastern-central-and-eastern-europe-vulnerabilities-and-resilience-in-four-countries-pub-85415. ↑
- Erik Brattberg, Philippe Le Corre, Paul Stronski, and Thomas de Waal, “China’s Influence in Southeastern, Central, and Eastern Europe: Vulnerabilities and Resilience in Four Countries,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, October 13, 2021, https://carnegieendowment.org/2021/10/13/china-s-influence-in-southeastern-central-and-eastern-europe-vulnerabilities-and-resilience-in-four-countries-pub-85415. ↑
- Richard Weitz, “China and the Black Sea Region: A Bridge Too Far?” September 16, 2020, Middle East Institute, https://www.mei.edu/publications/china-and-black-sea-region-bridge-too-far. ↑
- James McBride, Noah Berman, and Andrew Chatzky, “China’s Massive Belt and Road Initiative,” Council on Foreign Relations, February 2, 2023, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/chinas-massive-belt-and-road-initiative. ↑
- Ketty W. Chen et al., “CHINA’S INFLUENCE IN EUROPE: strategies towards a resilient and united EU,” Friedrich Naumann Foundation, May 2022,https://shop.freiheit.org/#!/Publikation/1259. ↑
- Lyssa White, “China’s Foreign Influence and Sharp Power Strategy to Shape and Influence Democratic Institutions,” published on May 16, 2019, National Endowment for Democracy, accessed August 5, 2023,https://www.ned.org/chinas-foreign-influence-and-sharp-power-strategy-to-shape-and-influence-democratic-institutions/ ↑
- “Joint Statement of the People’s Republic of China and Georgia on Establishing a Strategic Partnership,” Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in Georgia, accessed 5 August, 2023, http://ge.china-embassy.gov.cn/eng/xwdt/202308/t20230807_11123383.htm. ↑
- “Garibashvili: Georgia is First Country in Region to Begin Free Trade Negotiations with China,” Agenda.ge, accessed August 15, 2023, https://agenda.ge/en/news/2015/1988. ↑
- Barrech, Dost Muhammad, and Prof. Dr. Muhammad Khan. 2023. “US-China Growing Competition in Soft Power”. Journal of Social Sciences Review 3 (2):490-99. https://doi.org/10.54183/jssr.v3i2.288. ↑
- Alexandra Martin, “China in the Broader Black Sea Region,” GLOBSEC, March 16, 2023, accessed August 1, 2023, https://www.globsec.org/what-we-do/publications/china-broader-black-sea-region. ↑
- Joseph S. Nye Jr., Soft Power: The Means to Success in World Politics (New York: PublicAffairs, 2004). ↑
- “Georgia and China Issue Joint Statement on Strategic Partnership,” Civil Georgia, July 31, 2023, accessed August 15, 2023, https://civil.ge/archives/553820. ↑
- Gergely Salát, “Opportunities and Challenges for the Further Development of the 16+1 Framework,” in RESULTS AND CHALLENGES: TEN YEARS OF CHINA-CEEC COOPERATION, edited by Levente Horváth (John von Neumann University, Eurasia Center). ↑
- Soso Dzamukashvili, “Latvia and Estonia Out of 16+1: The Demise of China’s Cooperation with Central and Eastern Europe?” Forbes Georgia, September 12, 2022, accessed August 15, 2023, https://forbes.ge/en/moastsavebs-thu-ara-estonethisa-da-latviis-16-1-phormatidan-gasvla-chinethsa-da-tsentralur-da-aghmosavleth-evropis-qveqhnebs-shoris-thanamshromlobis-dasasruls/ ↑
